A footnote summary for the article titled:
Understanding Evidence Spoliation and Tips to Avoid It
By: Shannon C. King and Kevin L. Fritz
1. Michael F. Pezzulli, A Practical Guide to Presenting and Defending a Spoliation of Evidence Case (July 13, 2022), https://www.courtroom.com/blog/a-practical-guide-to-presenting-and-defending-a-spoliation-of-evidence-case/.
2. Id.
3. Kelly v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 720 N.E.2d 683, 693 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999).
4. Chrysler Realty Co., LLC v. Design Forum Architects, Inc., No. 06-CV11785, 2009 WL 5217992, *3 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 31, 2009).
5. Hynix Semiconductor Inc., 645 F.3d 1336; Micron Tech., Inc. v. Rambus Inc., 645 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
6. EEOC v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 2:09-cv-864, 295 F.R.D 166 (S.D. Ohio 2013) (focusing on the pre-lawsuit events that triggered a bank’s duty to preserve data and suspend its automatic purging process, including a notice from the EEOC that it was investigating class allegations and a request for information from the commission);
7. Baliotis v. McNeil, 870 F. Supp. 1285, 1289 (M.D. Pa. 1994) (quoting Fire Ins. Exch. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 747 P.2d 911, 914 (Nev. 1987) (“litigant is under a duty to preserve evidence which it knows or reasonably should know is relevant to the action”).
8. Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe Inc., 269 F.R.D. 497, 521 (D. Md. 2010) (quoting Zubulake v. UBS Warburg, LLC, 220 F.R.D. 212, 217-18 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).
9. Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corp., 223 F.R.D. 162, 175–76 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).
A complete printable version of the article and footnotes are available here: https://www.lashlybaer.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Footnote.pdf